Monogamy Sure Has Changed
Author: Guest
Total views: 1
Word Count: 814
In my grandparents\' day-that is, two generations or about eighty years ago-monogamy was pretty black and white. A guy and a gal would meet, start to date, become engaged and get married. Dating a lot, especially for a woman, put a question mark on a person\'s moral character. In those days, it was never a question of \"if\" this couple would become partnered for the rest of their lives (happy or not); rather, it was more a question of \"when\". Plus, it was scandalous if the couple chose to get a divorce.
adult novelty | female vibrators | love dolls
In my grandparents' day-that is, two generations or about eighty years ago-monogamy was pretty black and white. A guy and a gal would meet, start to date, become engaged and get married. Dating a lot, especially for a woman, put a question mark on a person's moral character.
In those days, it was never a question of "if" this couple would become partnered for the rest of their lives (happy or not); rather, it was more a question of "when". Plus, it was scandalous if the couple chose to get a divorce.
Cities and attitudes grew and, by the 1950s, the trend of dating started. Smokey Robinson said it best when he sang, "My momma told me you better shop around." Parents and teenagers came to understand that it was healthy to date, test the relationship waters and have a couple of broken hearts before settling down. Yet the single most important thing was to find a mate before turning twenty.
Then came the Baby Boomers and their rebellious free-love movement of the 1970s. Although anonymous sex certainly was not for everyone, there were enough people jumping on the sex-drugs-and-rock'n'roll bandwagon to make it more acceptable. Monogamy in the 1970s came to mean, "I'm going to have a whole lot of fun, and then I will settle down with one person for the rest of my life."
But "the rest of my life" seemed to scare a lot of this group and there grew a different sensibility with monogamy. Living together became the popular monogamous option of, "I do not know if I can commit to you, but let's give it a go and see how it turns out." Or, if the couple did decide to get married and it ended up unhappy, divorce became the alternative to staying in a loveless marriage like that of their parents.
By the 1980s, this trend ended up creating what is called serial monogamy. Serial monogamy is when a person is in an exclusive monogamous relationship for a period of time, decides the relationship is not for them, ends the relationship and looks for a new relationship. In effect, it is relationship-jumping. What makes it acceptable is there is no overlap (like adultery) but a distinct start and finish to the relationship.
In my opinion serial monogamy has created a nation of very picky people. I refer to it as Seinfeld Syndrome. In the TV show "Seinfeld," all four characters would nitpick every little thing that was wrong about the people they were dating. For example, one of Seinfeld's girlfriends had "man-hands" and he obsessed about her inadequacies until eventually he "had to" break up with her.
Seinfeld Syndrome has created a nation of disposable dating in that if a potential partner does not make the grade, there is always someone better around the corner.
In the new millennium, I see the monogamous trend changing into open relationships. An open relationship is based on two people having a primary relationship and still able to seek sexual variety outside of that relationship.
Open relationships are still very underground and lowly regarded because they do not follow the rules of serial monogamy. Those rules being it is okay to date and have multiple sex partners, but only if there is a definite break between relationships.
Even though open relationships are underground, they are prolific. The most common question I am asked by forty-something couples is around "swinging". Their motivation to ask is mostly out of curiosity and titillation. When I probe as to why they are interested, their response is they do not want to get a divorce but are not happy with their present sex life.
To give a sense of how this trend is picking up momentum, in Calgary, conservatively speaking, there are at least a few thousand couples engaging in some type of open relationship. In bigger centers like Vancouver or Seattle, the number jumps to tens of thousands.
The question now is what is the happy medium? Obviously there are pros and cons to both meeting one person and making it work regardless and being able to "shop till you drop" until meeting the right one. As well, can Canadians ever be able to accept open relationships as a normal part of a couple's sexual life?
One thing is certain: monogamy has changed dramatically over the last eighty years.
Article Source: Web Design Experts
About the Author
Rating: Not yet rated
Comments No comments posted.
Add Comment
You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.Copy and Paste Article Code.
Remember: The article body, title, author bio and links may not be changed or removed. By publishing this article, you agree to all the terms in our Terms of Service.
More articles in this Category
1: Millionaire Matchmaking Services Let You Outsource Your Dating Needs
2: What to Do About Internet Dating
3: Is Love at First Sight Real?
4: How to Approach Any Girl on the Street and Get Her to Fall in Love With You
5: Advantage and Disadvantages of Internet Dating
Main Menu
HomeLogin
Register
Submit Article
Latest Articles
Search
Pages
Links
Online Sex Shopsex toys | dildos | egg vibrator | penis pumps
Uggs
Site Stats
Total Category: 5Total articles: 18191
4 users online.
